Source: Marc J. Randazza 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🇧🇷 (@marcorandazza) on X
The problem with flock cameras:
They don’t prevent crime, they just help you figure out who did the crime
So when the “crime” is a guy in an insured and registered car pull up to a red light at 2 o’clock in the morning, there’s no one around for miles, so he just decides to drive through it to get home and go to bed, they catch him and they punish him
But when the crime is a violent rape or assault by a member of the Democrat Party shock troops (a.k.a. career criminals) even if they catch him, they don’t actually punish him.
So when you ask why I’m against mass surveillance, it’s not that I don’t see the potential benefits of it. It’s that I know that the downsides of it will be aimed at me, a law abiding citizen.
And I know this because this is how every gun regulation works. Criminals still get access to whatever guns they want. But if I met my Massachusetts residence and I have a 30 round magazine, I can go to jail for it. Meanwhile, the members of the superior caste, they have no problem carrying around a 30 round magazine.
If these things have been around during Covid, they would’ve turned them off for the George Floyd riots, but they’d have used it to nail me going to church or going to the beach.
So take your flock cameras and shove them up your ass.
Leave a Reply